In contexts where humanitarian organisations and communities are exposed to high insecurity, it is extremely challenging not only to deliver assistance, but also to assess its reach and effectiveness. The challenges of insecurity hamper every aspect of monitoring and evaluation (M&E), from the collection of evidence, its interpretation, to the sharing and dissemination of findings and M&E information.
GPPi leads research on accountability and learning as part of the Secure Access in Volatile Environments (SAVE) research programme. Since 2014, we have analysed different strategies for monitoring aid in collaboration with 18 partner aid organisations in Afghanistan, Syria, Somalia and South Sudan. Our research included over 250 interviews, 65 focus group discussions, a review of over 300 M&E documents and an online survey.
This interim website lists emerging findings and updates from our work. A summary of findings from our research on monitoring can be downloaded below.
For more information, please also visit the SAVE webpage and download the briefing note summarising the main findings from the overall SAVE research programme.
This report describes the main findings and recommendations of our research on Third-Party Monitoring (TPM), based on interviews with commissioning agencies, TPM providers and donors as well as a review of literature. A two-page summary can be downloaded here.
Specialists working with the Common Humanitarian Fund (CHF) in South Sudan help partners design their M&E systems, provide mentoring and hands-on advice, and verify partner reports. In this case study from South Sudan, we analyse the role and functioning of the CHF’s monitoring and reporting mechanism.
This briefing note summarises the general conclusions of a data tracking exercise implemented by the SAVE research team in Somalia. The exercise was conducted to identify unnecessary complexity and potentially redundant data collection in aid monitoring in insecure environments.